Jump to content

User talk:UtherSRG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Utherbot)


zOMG

[edit]
zOMG
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk

WikiProject Mammals Notice Board

[edit]

Happy holidays!

[edit]

Padshah UtherSRG 2024

[edit]

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

  • What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talkcontribs)

Notice of Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is User:Bkonrad. Matthewjaredgarza2010 (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to fail at understanding our practices and policies. Get ready for WP:BOOMERANG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I expected, the boomerang has hit. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

[edit]

Why was my request to reactivate my page blocked? 1-335 Warriors (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1-335 Warriors: You are mistaken. Your draft is here: Draft:335th Infantry Regiment (United States). I restored it, deleted your user page which you had incorrectly copied it from, and then put the appropriate source of the page in place. I also placed a conflict of interest notice you your talk page. Please read it and comply with our requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your recent reversion of a deletion in the article Muskox

[edit]

Hello. Recently I deleted this line from the article Muskox, which you restored by deleting my edit:

Muskoxen were introduced to Svalbard in 1925–26 and 1929, but this population died out in the 1970s.

The reason I did delete it for, is because the exact same information is conveyed in an earlier text just a few sentences above it:

An attempt to introduce the muskox to Svalbard also failed. Seventeen animals were released in 1929 by Adventfjorden on West Spitsbergen. In 1940, the herd numbered 50, but in the 1970s, the whole herd disappeared.

By the way, the sentence I deleted was actually added by me, with the same source (Aulagnier et al, 2008), when I created the subsection "Reintroductions in Eurasia". The other text was added by a different user at a later time, expanding the information about Norway but without caring if some of that was already present and became repeated as a result.

I now realize that the other user didn't add any sources however, even if what they say is compatible with what I've read on the subject. I'm not sure how to proceed, so I won't edit it, but I think the current text should be left as is, with the repetition.--Menah the Great (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Sorry, by your edit summary I thought you were deleting it because you thought Svalbad == Iceland, because where you deleted it from also mentioned Iceland. You could check the existing sources and see if they support the other editor's addition, and not that with the appropriate ref tag. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Talk:Lost (2004 TV series)/Archive 1 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 15 § Talk:Lost (2004 TV series)/Archive 1 until a consensus is reached. ASUKITE 01:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - my name is Matt Taibbi. I'm a reporter and writing about the decision to remove RCP. I'm trying to understand why it happened. I started covering campaigns in 2004, when it was the only polling aggregator in existence. It has a very strong track record and clearly outperformed the others in this cycle. It lists the error histories of all the polls it uses. Why would this service be removed? --Mtaibbi (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably ask on that page. I can assist with general questions or with questions about taxonomic articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]